The Peter Paul - Stan Lee story is a ticking bombshell
that is winding its way through the courts and could explode into the
headlines as suddenly as the Eliot Spitzer story did - and it would come
right in the closing days of the 2008 campaign, handing John McCain a
devastating campaign issue.
Hillary is now literally trying to keep one step ahead of
the process server to avoid receiving the subpoena that will force her to
testify in a trial that could result in felony charges that would her
behind bars for up to five years - and that's just one count. (See links
at the bottom of the page)
The viral frenzy surrounding the leaked thirteen-minute "rough
cut" trailer for "Hillary Uncensored" has resulted in a new
Internet record for a documentary trailer, with more than 5.6 million
YouTube and Google views since October 8, 2007 - even after Google
suddenly deleted the top-ranked video from its Top 10 and Top 100 lists!
Sen. Clinton's actions as shown in the film violated the following U.S.
Statutes:
2 U.S.C. Sec 441a (a)(7)(B)(I) provides:
Expenditures made by any person in cooperation, consultation, or
concert, with, or at the request or suggestion of, a candidate, his
authorized political committees, or their agents, shall be considered to
be a contribution to such candidate. (Therefore Peter Paul's
expenditures cannot be deemed to be a "soft money"
contribution)
(f) No candidate shall knowingly accept any contribution in
violation of the provisions of this section...
(a)(1)(A) No person shall make contributions... to any candidate
with respect to any election for Federal office which, in the aggregate,
exceed $2,000.
2 U.S.C. Sec 437g(d)(1)(A)(I) provides:
Any person who knowingly and willfully commits a violation of any
provision of this act which involves the making, receiving, or reporting
of any contribution, donation, or expenditure (I) aggregating $25,000 or
more during a calendar year shall be fined under Title 18, or imprisoned
for not more than 5 years, or both...
Posted:
February 19, 2008
11:27 pm Eastern
WorldNetDaily
Peter
Paul and President Clinton (Courtesy Hillcap.org) |
While
Hillary Clinton battles Barack Obama on the campaign trail, a judge in
Los Angeles is quietly preparing to set a trial date in a $17
million fraud suit that aims to expose an alleged culture of
widespread corruption by the Clintons and the Democratic Party.
At
the conclusion of a hearing tomorrow morning before California Superior
Court Judge Aurelio N. Munoz, lawyers for Hollywood mogul Peter
F. Paul will begin seeking sworn testimony from all three Clintons
– Bill, Hillary and Chelsea – along with top Democratic Party
leaders and A-list celebrities, including Barbra Streisand, John
Travolta, Brad Pitt and Cher.
Paul's
team hopes for a trial in October. The Clintons' longtime lawyer David
Kendall, who will attend the hearing, has declined comment on the suit.
The
Clintons have tried to dismiss the case, but the California Supreme
Court, in 2004, upheld a lower-court decision to deny the motion.
Bill
Clinton, according to the complaint, promised to promote Paul's Internet
entertainment company, Stan Lee Media, in exchange for stock, cash
options and massive contributions to his wife's 2000 Senate campaign.
Paul contends he was directed by the Clintons and Democratic Party
leaders to produce, pay for and then join them in lying about footing
the bill for a Hollywood gala and fundraiser.
The
Clintons' legal counsel has denied the former president made any deal
with Paul. But Paul attorney Colette Wilson told WND there are witnesses
who say it was common knowledge at Stan Lee Media that Bill Clinton was
preparing to be a rainmaker for the company after he left office.
Paul
claims former Vice President Al Gore, former Democratic Party chairman
Ed Rendell and Clinton presidential campaign chairman Terry McAuliffe
also are among the people who can confirm Paul engaged in the deal.
Hillary
Clinton with Peter and Andrea Paul (Courtesy Hillcap.org) |
Paul
claims Rendell directed various illegal contributions to the DNC and
Hillary Clinton's campaign and failed to report to the Federal Election
Commission more than $100,000 given for a Hollywood event for Gore's
campaign and the Democratic National Committee in 2000. McAuliffe, Paul
says, counseled him in two separate meetings to become a major donor to
Hillary Clinton to pave the way to hire her husband. Paul asserts top
Clinton adviser Harold Ickes also directed him to give money to the
Senate campaign but hid that fact in "perjured testimony"
during the trial of campaign finance director David Rosen.
Rosen
was acquitted in 2005 for filing false campaign reports that later were
charged by the FEC to treasurer Andrew Grossman, who accepted
responsibility in a conciliation agreement that fined the campaign
35,000. Paul points out the Rosen trial established his contention that
he personally gave more than $1.2 million to Clinton's campaign and that
his contributions intentionally were hidden from the public and the
Federal Election Commission.
Rosen,
accused of concealing Paul's in-kind contribution of more than $1
million, was acquitted, but Paul contends the Clinton staffer was a
scapegoat. Paul points out chief Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson told
the Washington Post he was aware of the donation, yet he never was
called as a witness in the Rosen trial.
Paul
contends his case will expose "the institutional culture of
corruption embraced by the Clinton leadership of the Democratic
Party," which seeks to attain "unaccountable power for the
Clintons at the expense of the rule of law and respect for the
constitutional processes of government."
The
complaint asserts Clinton has filed four false reports to the FEC of
Paul's donations in an attempt to distance herself from him after a
Washington Post story days after the August 2000 fundraiser reported his
past felony convictions. Clinton then returned a check for $2,000,
insisting it was the only money she had taken from Paul. But one
month later, she demanded another $100,000, to be hidden in a state
committee using untraceable securities.
"Why
wouldn't that cause someone to inquire?" Paul asked.
"Especially since it was days after she said she wouldn't take any
more money from me."
Paul
has the support
of a new grass-roots political action group that is helping garner
the assistance of one of the nation's top lawyers
Republican
activist Rod Martin says his group plans to highlight Paul's case as it
launches an organization based on the business model of the left-wing
MoveOn.org but rooted in the principles and political philosophy of
former President Reagan.
Martin's
group also is assisting in Paul's complaint to the FEC asserting that
unless the agency sets aside the conciliation agreement and rescinds
immunity granted the senator, it will "have aided and abetted in
the commission" of a felony.
Paul's
case is the subject of a video
documentary largely comprised of intimate "home movies" of
Hillary Clinton and her Hollywood supporters captured by Paul during the
period.
SOURCE:
WorldNetDaily,
Feb. 28, 2008
The ABC 20/20 Brian Ross Investigative Report on Peter
Paul's Allegations of FEC Fraud by Hillary and Bill Clinton, aired on July
13, 2001.
(www.peterfpaul.com) Disney brass
were coerced by Hillary to re-edit the piece the night before broadcast to
take out all references to Hillary's finance director, David Rosen, a
direct link between Paul and Hillary, at the heart of Paul's allegations
of election fraud.
In May, 2005.
Rosen's defense used the altered ABC 20/20 program as evidence it
presented to the jury to prove that Paul never implicated Rosen in the
fraud in the 20/20 program, and therefore Rosen was innocent of his
allegations. This deceived the jurors, and the program deceived the
viewers to believe that Hillary was not involved in the fraud that was
coordinated by Rosen, and then, on December 13, 2005, (www.hillcap.org)
admitted by Rosen's superior, Treasurer Andrew Grossman! www.hillcap.org.
Documentary trailer that exposes the lies Hillary made to
the voters and her opponent through the Washington Post (www.hillcap.org)
and to
the FEC in 2000 about who her
largest contributor was,(Spider Man creator Stan Lee's partner, Peter F
Paul) how much he gave and why he gave more than $1.6 million to her so he
could have Bill Clinton work with his public company, Stan Lee Media, when
Clinton left the White House.
Hillary's top donor in 2000, Peter Paul has a landmark
civil fraud suit pending in California court against Hillary and Bill and
Grammy's
producer Gary Smith. (see www.hillcap.org)
Paul alleged both Clintons agreed that Bill would work for Paul and his
company with Spider Man creator Stan Lee when he left the White House.
Paul took a polygraph test for Hillary: The Movie to corroborate his
allegations that both Clintons agreed that Bill would work with Paul when
he left the White House. Bill Clinton is charged with fraudulently
inducing and coercing Paul to spend more than $1.2 million for Hillary's
campaign and then destroying his public company, Stan Lee Media by
illegally interfering with Paul's Japanese partner through
"selling" photos in the Oval Office and incorporating a US
subsidiary with Bill Clinton as a silent partner to destroy Paul.
