Wednesday,
November 29, 2006
By Jessica Fraser
(NewsTarget) The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)
announced last week that it has deregulated a genetically
engineered variety of rice that contaminated the U.S. rice
supply over the summer.
The rice -- a special long-grain variety created by
Bayer CropScience called LL601 -- invaded non-genetically
modified crops in nearby fields after Bayer abandoned its
test plots in 2001. Bayer applied for approval of LL601
with the USDA and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
shortly after the contamination was reported in August.
Bayer is currently facing a class-action lawsuit filed
by hundreds of farmers
in Missouri and Arkansas over the approval of the GM rice,
which has contaminated non-GM rice supplies and severely
affected rice exports. Because European officials refuse to
accept imports of U.S. genetically engineered rice --
dubbed "Frankenfood" -- farmers whose crops
have been invaded by LL601 have seen a 10 percent drop in
prices since September. Total export losses are estimated
at $150 million.
The USDA's decision to deem LL601 safe was based on the
rice's similarity to previously approved rice varieties.
Essentially, the
USDA permitted Bayer to skip several of the standard
safety tests because LL601 -- which is designed to resist
Bayer's Liberty weed killer -- is similar to two types of
approved Bayer
biotech rice that the company never commercialized because
farmers did not want them in their crops.
"The protein in the company's herbicide-tolerant
rice varieties ... is well known to regulators, who have
affirmed the rice poses no human health or environmental
concern," said Bayer spokesman Greg Coffey, who
confirmed that the company does not plan to sell LL601.
However, according to Joseph Mendelson, legal director
of the nonprofit Center for Food Safety, the USDA's rapid
approval of LL601 highlights the agency's protection of the
biotechnology
industry.
"USDA
is telling agricultural biotechnology companies that it
doesn't matter if you're negligent, if you break the rules,
if you contaminate the food
supply with untested genetically engineered crops,
we'll bail you out," Mendelson said. "In effect,
the USDA is sanctioning an 'approval-by-contamination'
policy that can only increase the likelihood of untested
genetically engineered crops entering the food supply in
the future." |
Consumer advocate
Mike Adams, author of "Grocery
Warning," said the approval is "yet another
blatant example" of the USDA's willingness to protect the
business interests of influential food producers.
"Rather than declaring an ecological emergency due to
widespread crop contamination by this unnatural strain of
rice, the USDA simply rubber-stamped it as safe for everyone,
bypassing the safety testing required by law and effectively
whitewashing the ecological ramifications," Adams said.
Though the rice has been found safe to eat and is found in
a number of varieties of GM corn, cotton and canola, the 300
farmers who are suing Bayer say approving LL601 as
"safe" does nothing to change Europe's stance on not
allowing GM rice imports.
"Unless the U.S. export countries change their view
and begin to regain a sense of confidence in U.S. rice, the
U.S. rice farmers are still hurt and this whole ruling is
illusory in its effect," said Adam Levitt, an attorney
for roughly 300 of the farmers suing Bayer. "It's not a
victory at all, because at the end of the day people are not
purchasing U.S. rice and the exports markets are absolutely
closed still."
Though the USDA's ruling on LL601 means Bayer cannot be
held responsible for introducing an illegal variety of GM rice
into U.S. crops, the company is still under investigation for
allowing the engineered rice to escape its abandoned test
plots.
USDA spokeswoman Rachel Iadicicco said Bayer might have
violated the agency's Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS) regulations for handling the genetically
altered rice. APHIS was designed to protect ecosystems,
natural resources, agribusiness, agricultural exports and
consumer health and safety from threats such as non-compliant
biotechnology events and invasive species.
"The deregulation [of LL601] doesn't preclude any
legal action against the company for violation of APHIS
regulations," Iadicicco said. "Violators of APHIS
regulations can face criminal penalties, civil penalties and
remediation costs."
USDA
approves genetically engineered rice
that contaminated U.S. food supply; safety tests skipped
|